• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Kloptdatwel?

  • Home
  • Onderwerpen
    • (Bij)Geloof
    • Columns
    • Complottheorieën
    • Factchecking
    • Gezondheid
    • Hoax
    • Humor
    • K-d-Weetjes
    • New Age
    • Paranormaal
    • Pseudowetenschap
    • Reclame Code Commissie
    • Skepticisme
    • Skeptics in the Pub
    • Skeptische TV
    • UFO
    • Wetenschap
    • Overig
  • Skeptisch Chatten
  • Werkstuk?
  • Contact
  • Over Kloptdatwel.nl
    • Activiteiten agenda
    • Colofon – (copyright info)
    • Gedragsregels van Kloptdatwel
    • Kloptdatwel in de media
    • Interessante Links
    • Over het Bol.com Partnerprogramma en andere affiliate programma’s.
    • Social media & Twitter
    • Nieuwsbrief
    • Privacybeleid
    • Skeptisch Chatten
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 1)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 2)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 3)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 4)

schaakbord illusie

De schaakbord schaduw illusie

1 October 2012 by Gert Jan van 't Land 8 Comments

LEES DIT MET CHROME. Je gelooft je ogen niet:

The video you’re watching is a real-life demonstration of an optical illusion developed in 1995 by Edward Adelson, a professor in MIT’s Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences. The Checker Shadow Illusion, as Adelson calls it, shows that our “visual system is not very good at being a physical light meter.” But more importantly, the optical illusion offers important insight into how our visual system tries to break down “image information into meaningful components, and thereby perceive the nature of the objects in view.” Adelson’s full explanation of the illusion and what it reveals appears below the jump (or here). H/T 3 Quarks Daily

 The visual system needs to determine the color of objects in the world. In this case the problem is to determine the gray shade of the checks on the floor. Just measuring the light coming from a surface (the luminance) is not enough: a cast shadow will dim a surface, so that a white surface in shadow may be reflecting less light than a black surface in full light. The visual system uses several tricks to determine where the shadows are and how to compensate for them, in order to determine the shade of gray “paint” that belongs to the surface.

The first trick is based on local contrast. In shadow or not, a check that is lighter than its neighboring checks is probably lighter than average, and vice versa. In the figure, the light check in shadow is surrounded by darker checks. Thus, even though the check is physically dark, it is light when compared to its neighbors. The dark checks outside the shadow, conversely, are surrounded by lighter checks, so they look dark by comparison.

A second trick is based on the fact that shadows often have soft edges, while paint boundaries (like the checks) often have sharp edges. The visual system tends to ignore gradual changes in light level, so that it can determine the color of the surfaces without being misled by shadows. In this figure, the shadow looks like a shadow, both because it is fuzzy and because the shadow casting object is visible.

The “paintness” of the checks is aided by the form of the “X-junctions” formed by 4 abutting checks. This type of junction is usually a signal that all the edges should be interpreted as changes in surface color rather than in terms of shadows or lighting.

As with many so-called illusions, this effect really demonstrates the success rather than the failure of the visual system. The visual system is not very good at being a physical light meter, but that is not its purpose. The important task is to break the image information down into meaningful components, and thereby perceive the nature of the objects in view.

Via: http://www.openculture.com/2011/08/mit_checker_shadow_illusion.html

Filed Under: Overig, Skeptische TV Tagged With: schaakbord illusie, video

Primary Sidebar

Steun ons via:
Een aankoopbol.com Partner (meer info)
Of een donatie

Schrijf je in voor de nieuwsbrief!

Skeptic RSS feed

  • Error
  • Error
  • SBM

RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: cURL error 28: Failed to connect to skepsis.nl port 443 after 5205 ms: Connection timed out

RSS Error: A feed could not be found at `https://skepp.be/feed`; the status code is `404` and content-type is `text/html; charset=UTF-8`

Dr. Vinay Prasad: “The Incidence of Myocarditis Found for Young Men after SARS-CoV-2 Infection is Larger Than What We Found for Myocarditis Following COVID-19 Vaccination.”
2 December 2025 - Jonathan Howard

That plus 12 other thoughts about Dr. Vinay Prasad's recent memo. The post Dr. Vinay Prasad: “The Incidence of Myocarditis Found for Young Men after SARS-CoV-2 Infection is Larger Than What We Found for Myocarditis Following COVID-19 Vaccination.” first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is definitely coming for your vaccines, part 5: VAERS and a useful idiot at the FDA
1 December 2025 - David Gorski

In the sadly continuing story of how Health and Human Services Secretary RFK Jr. is working to eliminate vaccines, we look at a useful idiot, Dr. Vinay Prasad, and how he is weaponizing dead children to justify making vaccines harder to approve. The post Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is definitely coming for your vaccines, part 5: VAERS and a useful idiot at the FDA first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

Read the Comments: “Just Do the Opposite of Whatever This Administration Recommends!”
29 November 2025 - Jonathan Howard

It's obviously not good that people have lost trust in the FDA, NIH, and CDC. However, since those once vulnerable institutions are now lead by naked emperors, it's good that the American public, at least those that read the news, has uniformly recognized they have no clothes. The post Read the Comments: “Just Do the Opposite of Whatever This Administration Recommends!” first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

Recente reacties

  • Hans1263 on Bedenkingen bij het rapport over oversterfte van Ronald Meester en Marc Jacobs@Renate Zo is het. Ja, dat komt precies, want anders kun je geen analytische chemie bedrijven en krijg je verkeerde
  • Renate1 on Bedenkingen bij het rapport over oversterfte van Ronald Meester en Marc Jacobs@ Hans, Dat bedoelde ik. Het is natuurlijk de optelsom van het atoomgewicht van de atomen in het molecuul.
  • Hans1263 on Bedenkingen bij het rapport over oversterfte van Ronald Meester en Marc JacobsHet molecuulgewicht, @ Renate. Heel dichtbij. Waar het over gaat is dat de betreffende politici kakelen zonder te weten waar
  • Renate1 on Bedenkingen bij het rapport over oversterfte van Ronald Meester en Marc JacobsIk heb ook de indruk dat veel mensen er trots op zijn dat ze weinig kennis van exacte vakken hebben.
  • Hans1263 on Bedenkingen bij het rapport over oversterfte van Ronald Meester en Marc Jacobs@Renate Bij de meeste toehoorders kun je zo'n chemisch begrip zonder probleem feitenvrij verkwanselen.

Archief Kloptdatwel.nl

Copyright © 2025 · Metro Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in