• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Kloptdatwel?

  • Home
  • Onderwerpen
    • (Bij)Geloof
    • Columns
    • Complottheorieën
    • Factchecking
    • Gezondheid
    • Hoax
    • Humor
    • K-d-Weetjes
    • New Age
    • Paranormaal
    • Pseudowetenschap
    • Reclame Code Commissie
    • Skepticisme
    • Skeptics in the Pub
    • Skeptische TV
    • UFO
    • Wetenschap
    • Overig
  • Skeptisch Chatten
  • Werkstuk?
  • Contact
  • Over Kloptdatwel.nl
    • Activiteiten agenda
    • Colofon – (copyright info)
    • Gedragsregels van Kloptdatwel
    • Kloptdatwel in de media
    • Interessante Links
    • Over het Bol.com Partnerprogramma en andere affiliate programma’s.
    • Social media & Twitter
    • Nieuwsbrief
    • Privacybeleid
    • Skeptisch Chatten
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 1)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 2)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 3)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 4)

schaakbord illusie

De schaakbord schaduw illusie

1 October 2012 by Gert Jan van 't Land 8 Comments

LEES DIT MET CHROME. Je gelooft je ogen niet:

The video you’re watching is a real-life demonstration of an optical illusion developed in 1995 by Edward Adelson, a professor in MIT’s Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences. The Checker Shadow Illusion, as Adelson calls it, shows that our “visual system is not very good at being a physical light meter.” But more importantly, the optical illusion offers important insight into how our visual system tries to break down “image information into meaningful components, and thereby perceive the nature of the objects in view.” Adelson’s full explanation of the illusion and what it reveals appears below the jump (or here). H/T 3 Quarks Daily

 The visual system needs to determine the color of objects in the world. In this case the problem is to determine the gray shade of the checks on the floor. Just measuring the light coming from a surface (the luminance) is not enough: a cast shadow will dim a surface, so that a white surface in shadow may be reflecting less light than a black surface in full light. The visual system uses several tricks to determine where the shadows are and how to compensate for them, in order to determine the shade of gray “paint” that belongs to the surface.

The first trick is based on local contrast. In shadow or not, a check that is lighter than its neighboring checks is probably lighter than average, and vice versa. In the figure, the light check in shadow is surrounded by darker checks. Thus, even though the check is physically dark, it is light when compared to its neighbors. The dark checks outside the shadow, conversely, are surrounded by lighter checks, so they look dark by comparison.

A second trick is based on the fact that shadows often have soft edges, while paint boundaries (like the checks) often have sharp edges. The visual system tends to ignore gradual changes in light level, so that it can determine the color of the surfaces without being misled by shadows. In this figure, the shadow looks like a shadow, both because it is fuzzy and because the shadow casting object is visible.

The “paintness” of the checks is aided by the form of the “X-junctions” formed by 4 abutting checks. This type of junction is usually a signal that all the edges should be interpreted as changes in surface color rather than in terms of shadows or lighting.

As with many so-called illusions, this effect really demonstrates the success rather than the failure of the visual system. The visual system is not very good at being a physical light meter, but that is not its purpose. The important task is to break the image information down into meaningful components, and thereby perceive the nature of the objects in view.

Via: http://www.openculture.com/2011/08/mit_checker_shadow_illusion.html

Filed Under: Overig, Skeptische TV Tagged With: schaakbord illusie, video

Primary Sidebar

Steun ons via:
Een aankoopbol.com Partner (meer info)
Of een donatie

Schrijf je in voor de nieuwsbrief!

Skeptic RSS feed

  • Skepsis
  • Error
  • SBM
Fluoride-angst?
30 June 2025 - Ward van Beek
Fluoride-angst?

Raad eens’, vraagt Cor van Loveren: ‘Het is begin jaren zeventig. Hoeveel gaatjes denk je dat een kind van vijf gemiddeld had?’ Het antwoord: achttien. ‘In haast elke tand zat wel een gat.’ Gemiddeld genomen dan. Er waren ook tanden…Lees meer Fluoride-angst? › [...]

James Randi test wichelroedelopers in Australië
11 June 2025 - SkepsisSiteBeheerder
James Randi test wichelroedelopers in Australië

In 1980 bezocht James Randi Australië op uitnodiging van Dick Smith om daar een test uit te voeren met wichelroedelopers.Lees meer James Randi test wichelroedelopers in Australië › [...]

Polarisatie juist goed voor democratie?
5 June 2025 - Ward van Beek
Polarisatie juist goed voor democratie?

.Soms lijkt het wel alsof we elkaar de hele dag de tent uit vechten. Op social media, bij verjaardagsfeestjes en in talkshows zijn we het oneens over vaccins, over Gaza, over vrouwenrechten. Dat blijkt ook uit onderzoek van het Sociaal…Lees meer Polarisatie juist goed voor democratie? › [...]

RSS Error: A feed could not be found at `https://skepp.be/feed`; the status code is `404` and content-type is `text/html; charset=UTF-8`

With Laura Loomer on One Side and Dr. Paul Offit on the Other, Our FDA Leaders are Caught in a Trap of Their Own Making
25 July 2025 - Jonathan Howard

After years of bashing the medical establishment, Drs. Vinay Prasad and Marty Makary are stuck in a trap. Any attempt to escape only tightens its grip. The post With Laura Loomer on One Side and Dr. Paul Offit on the Other, Our FDA Leaders are Caught in a Trap of Their Own Making first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

FDA Has Replaced its Leadership With Doctors Who Have Done Their “Research”
24 July 2025 - Jonathan Howard

"Families that say" qualifies as hard data at the FDA. The post FDA Has Replaced its Leadership With Doctors Who Have Done Their “Research” first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

The Healthcare Costs of Fossil Fuels
23 July 2025 - Steven Novella

While the debate continues about the true impact of burning fossil fuels on the climate and what the optimal policy response should be, we need to make sure we do not neglect another aspect of fossil fuel use – air pollution and the effect is has on our health. There is a growing body of research showing a significant negative impact with […] The post The Healthcare Costs of Fossil Fuels first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

Recente reacties

  • Renate1 on De linke weekendbijlage (29-2025)Welkom bij de cursus warhoofd voor beginners, zonder al te veel echt kritische vragen. https://www.volkskrant.nl/binnenland/jager-verzamelaa
  • Renate1 on De linke weekendbijlage (28-2025)@ Hans, Ja, het antwoord van de VPRO op de vragen van de VtdK vond ik ook van een dubieus
  • Hans1263 on De linke weekendbijlage (28-2025)@Renate1 De Vereniging tegen de Kwakzalverij heeft de VPRO benaderd over het zeer dubieuze kwakzalverijgehalte van de gedachtengang van mw.
  • Renate1 on De linke weekendbijlage (28-2025)Dat is mijn idee ook. Nu moet ik zeggen dat ik toch al zelden naar Zomergasten kijk, maar in dit
  • Hans1263 on De linke weekendbijlage (28-2025)@Renate1 Iemand die als dramaturg en als journalist heeft gewerkt resp. nog werkt en op basis van zeer dubieuze "hervonden

Archief Kloptdatwel.nl

Copyright © 2025 · Metro Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in