• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Kloptdatwel?

  • Home
  • Onderwerpen
    • (Bij)Geloof
    • Columns
    • Complottheorieën
    • Factchecking
    • Gezondheid
    • Hoax
    • Humor
    • K-d-Weetjes
    • New Age
    • Paranormaal
    • Pseudowetenschap
    • Reclame Code Commissie
    • Skepticisme
    • Skeptics in the Pub
    • Skeptische TV
    • UFO
    • Wetenschap
    • Overig
  • Skeptisch Chatten
  • Werkstuk?
  • Contact
  • Over Kloptdatwel.nl
    • Activiteiten agenda
    • Colofon – (copyright info)
    • Gedragsregels van Kloptdatwel
    • Kloptdatwel in de media
    • Interessante Links
    • Over het Bol.com Partnerprogramma en andere affiliate programma’s.
    • Social media & Twitter
    • Nieuwsbrief
    • Privacybeleid
    • Skeptisch Chatten
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 1)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 2)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 3)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 4)

see you in court

Simon Singh vs chiropractors

21 May 2011 by Maarten Koller 1 Comment

In het allereerste bericht hier op Kloptdatwel schreef ik over Simon Singh, die op het symposium van de Vereniging tegen de Kwakzalverij sprak over (onder andere) zijn problemen in Engeland waar hij aangeklaagd werd wegens smaad. Hij schreef namelijk dat de Britse chiropractors zonder enig bewijs ‘bogus’ behandelingen promoten. In plaats van met bewijs te komen ga je dan dus (aan)klagen.

Onderstaande samenvatting komt van de website Libelreform.org, een website die het herzien van de smaad-wetten in Engeland promoot.

Claimant: British Chiropractic Association (BCA), UK

Respondent: Simon Singh, journalist and author, UK

Simon Singh, the best-selling author of Fermat’s Last Theorem and The Code Book, published an article in the Guardian in April 2008 in which he discussed chiropractic treatment with reference to the British Chiropractic Association.

In a passage describing the BCA’s claims about the treatment of a number of childhood ailments, Singh wrote that ‘even though there is not a jot of evidence’ the BCA ‘happily promotes bogus treatments’.

Despite the article being published in the Guardian, Singh was sued personally. Mr Justice Eady decided on the issue of meaning in May 2009, and found that Singh’s comments were statements of fact, rather than expressions of opinion, which implied that the BCA was being deliberately dishonest. It was a meaning that Singh has said he never intended. Eady refused to grant leave to appeal, although permission was granted by the Court of Appeal itself in October 2009.

As a result of this case, the charity Sense About Science launched a petition for libel reform. Richard Dawkins has said that if Singh loses, it would have ‘major implications on the freedom of scientists, researchers and other commentators to engage in robust criticism of scientific, and pseudoscientific, work’.

BBC One zond onlangs See You In Court uit. Een programma over bijzondere smaad rechtszaken.

Almost two years in the making, See You in Court features unprecedented access to those affected by libel cases and explores how splashes in the media affect the individuals at the heart of them. London has become known as the “libel capital of the world” with people coming from far away to use the British courts and legal system to sue if they feel their privacy has been invaded or their reputation damaged. But what exactly is a reputation, how much is one worth and is it just the rich and famous that get to fight over them?

In this week’s episode we follow science writer Simon Singh and his court battle with the British Chiropractic Association and family man Tristan Rogers who finds himself in hot water, having to defend comments he posted on an online property forum.

Deel 1:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5su8am0b58

Deel 2:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMfm0R_DEuM

De petitie kan nog steeds ondertekend worden op Libelreform.org.

Filed Under: Buitenland, Gezondheid, Skepticisme, Uit het nieuws Tagged With: bbc, bca, bogus, chiropractor, libel, see you in court, simon singh, smaad

Primary Sidebar

Steun ons via:
Een aankoopbol.com Partner (meer info)
Of een donatie

Schrijf je in voor de nieuwsbrief!

Skeptic RSS feed

  • Skepsis
  • Error
  • SBM
Ype & Ionica zijn skeptisch
3 August 2026 - Ward van Beek

. Ook in het zomernummer van Skepter zijn Ype en Ionica weer skeptisch … [...]

No Title
31 July 2026 - Ward van Beek

. Robert Baden-Powell liet er in 1908, in de eerste druk van zijn Scouting for boys geen twijfel over bestaan: ‘Ga nooit pal na een maaltijd in diep water zwemmen, want dan krijg je hoogstwaarschijnlijk kramp, waardoor je dubbelklapt en…Lees meer › [...]

Pleisterplakkers in de topspsort
31 July 2026 - Ward van Beek

. Na mondtape is nu de neuspleister in trek bij topsporters. Ze hopen ermee hun hartslag te verlagen terwijl ze meer zuurstof opnemen. Daarop heeft zo’n pleister geen effect. Maar het gevoel ‘makkelijker te ademen’ kan goud waard zijn. Door…Lees meer Pleisterplakkers in de topspsort › [...]

RSS Error: Retrieved unsupported status code "404"

Cancer quackery: Under MAHA, everything old is new again
10 August 2026 - David Gorski
Cancer quackery: Under MAHA, everything old is new again

A viral Instagram post claims that cancer is not a disease, but rather a defense mechanism against "toxins." Everything old is new again under MAHA. The post Cancer quackery: Under MAHA, everything old is new again first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

Stanford President Jonathan Levin: You Should Host a Conference on the Job Performance of MAHA/MAGA Doctors
7 August 2026 - Jonathan Howard
Stanford President Jonathan Levin:  You Should Host a Conference on the Job Performance of MAHA/MAGA Doctors

In October 2024, you gave the introduction to a COVID Amnesia Project conference that featured disinformation superspreaders and advocates of herd immunity through mass infection. How do you feel these MAHA/MAGA doctors are doing today? The post Stanford President Jonathan Levin: You Should Host a Conference on the Job Performance of MAHA/MAGA Doctors first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

AI And Pseudoscience
5 August 2026 - Steven Novella
AI And Pseudoscience

We have to deal with artificial intelligence (AI). We cannot simply dismiss it or criticize it, and we certainly shouldn’t just embrace it without significant skepticism. But I feel it is necessary for any science communicator to do their best to become AI-literate – even if AI itself is not your field of communication. AI now touches everything. For example, increasingly people […] The post AI And Pseudoscience first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

Recente reacties

  • Renate1
    on De linke weekendbijlage (32-2026)
    Inderdaad.
  • Hans1263
    on De linke weekendbijlage (32-2026)
    @Renate Geenstijl en de volgers van deze gore site maake nooit geen vouten, laat staan dat ze vergissingen rechtzetten.
  • Renate1
    on De linke weekendbijlage (32-2026)
    De reacties onder het stuk op Geen Stijl zijn wel weer genoeg om me ver van deze website te krijgen.
  • De linke weekendbijlage (32-2026) - Kloptdatwel?
    on Genomineerden voor de Meester Kackadorisprijs 2026
    […] Al gestemd in onze poll voor de Meester Kackadorisprijs? […]
  • Klaas van Dijk
    on Bedenkingen bij het rapport over oversterfte van Ronald Meester en Marc Jacobs
    De afgelopen jaren heeft Ronald Meester zeker zes maal de voor de wetenschap cruciale kwaliteitscontrole vooraf, zie norm 51 van

Archief Kloptdatwel.nl

Copyright © 2026 · Metro Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in