• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Kloptdatwel?

  • Home
  • Onderwerpen
    • (Bij)Geloof
    • Columns
    • Complottheorieën
    • Factchecking
    • Gezondheid
    • Hoax
    • Humor
    • K-d-Weetjes
    • New Age
    • Paranormaal
    • Pseudowetenschap
    • Reclame Code Commissie
    • Skepticisme
    • Skeptics in the Pub
    • Skeptische TV
    • UFO
    • Wetenschap
    • Overig
  • Skeptisch Chatten
  • Werkstuk?
  • Contact
  • Over Kloptdatwel.nl
    • Activiteiten agenda
    • Colofon – (copyright info)
    • Gedragsregels van Kloptdatwel
    • Kloptdatwel in de media
    • Interessante Links
    • Over het Bol.com Partnerprogramma en andere affiliate programma’s.
    • Social media & Twitter
    • Nieuwsbrief
    • Privacybeleid
    • Skeptisch Chatten
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 1)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 2)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 3)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 4)
You are here: Home / Humor / Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt

8 December 2011 by Maarten Koller 4 Comments

Cracked.com is een humoristische website over lijstjes. Top 10 dit, de 7 beste zo etc. Wie is er niet dol op lijstjes?

Onlangs schreven ze over: 5 Logical Fallacies That Make You Wrong More Than You Think

Hieronder hun nummer 5:

#5. We’re Not Programmed to Seek “Truth,” We’re Programmed to “Win”

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 1

Think about the last time you ran into a coworker or family member spouting some easily disproven conspiracy theory — somebody who still thinks Obama’s birth certificate is a fake or that Dick Cheney arranged 9/11 to cover up his theft of $2.3 trillion from the government. When they were shown proof that their conspiracy theory was wrong, did they back down? Did they get this look of realization on their face and say, “Wow … if this is untrue, then maybe the other ‘facts’ upon which I’ve based my fringe beliefs also aren’t true. Thank you, kind stranger, for helping me rethink my entire political philosophy!”

That has literally never happened in the history of human conversation. Whether it’s a politician whose point has been refuted or a conspiracy theorist who has been definitively proven insane, they will immediately shift to the next talking point or conspiracy theory that backs up their side, not even skipping a beat. They keep fighting to defend their position even after it is factually shown to be untrue. But what’s really weird is that process — of sticking to your guns even after you’ve been proven definitively wrong — is apparently the entire reason humans invented arguing.

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 2Getty
“OK, so Dick Cheney doesn’t have a third arm. He might still be capable of spitting acid.”

The Science:

It’s called the argumentative theory of reasoning, and it says that humans didn’t learn to ask questions and offer answers in order to find universal truths. We did it as a way to gain authority over others. That’s right — they think that reason itself evolved to help us bully people into getting what we want. Here’s how a proponent puts it:

“‘Reasoning doesn’t have this function of helping us to get better beliefs and make better decisions,’ said Hugo Mercier, who is a co-author of the journal article, with Dan Sperber. ‘It was a purely social phenomenon. It evolved to help us convince others and to be careful when others try to convince us.’ Truth and accuracy were beside the point.”

And as evidence, the researchers point out that after thousands of years of humans sitting around campfires and arguing about issues, these glaring flaws in our logic still exist. Why hasn’t evolution weeded them out? The answer, they say, is that these cognitive flaws are adaptations to a system that’s working perfectly fine, thank you. Our evolutionary compulsion is to triumph, even if it means being totally, illogically, proudly wrong.

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 3Getty
“Check it out, you guys, Carl has something called ‘Loose Change’ loaded up on his iPhone.”

Yes, kids, being a dick works.

So During Your Next Argument, Remember …

You do this, too. If you’re a human being, you’re from a long line of people who got to the winner’s circle again and again by ignoring facts in favor of advancing your side. So, the next time you find yourself desperately Googling for some factual example that proves your argument is right, and failing to find even one, stop. See if you can put the brakes on and actually say, out loud, “Wait a second. If the things I’m saying in order to bolster my argument are consistently wrong, then maybe my argument is also wrong.”

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 4
“But if President Obama isn’t a serial killer, what does my life mean?”

It’s going to be harder than you think. Back when evolution was still sculpting your ancestor’s brains, admitting you were wrong to the person you were debating got you bred out of existence. These days, being able to admit you’re wrong is the greatest skill you can develop if you want to stay married.

Lees hier de andere 4: 5 Logical Fallacies That Make You Wrong More Than You Think | Cracked.com

Steun Kloptdatwel

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 5Waardeer je dit artikel? Je kunt onze site steunen met een financiële bijdrage. Dat waarderen wij dan weer! Een donatie kun je doen via dit betaalverzoek (of klik op de afbeelding hiernaast).

NB de rekening staat op naam van Maarten Koller, formeel eigenaar van deze site.

« Previous Entry
Leugens over Louwes
Next Entry »
Pas op: abstraheren is weglaten!

Filed Under: Humor Tagged With: cracked.com, drogreden

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Anony says

    8 December 2011 at 11:11

    Altijd leuk om te lezen, Cracked. Je moet er soms wel een korrel zout bij nemen, maar dit lijstje is een feest van herkenning.

    Log in to Reply
  2. pro-hom says

    9 December 2011 at 19:21

    Slaat het ook op jouzelf, Maarten?
    En op sceptici in het algemeen?Of zijn jullie de enigen die hiervan gevrijwaard zijn?

    Log in to Reply
    • Maarten Koller says

      9 December 2011 at 20:51

      Jazeker slaat die op mij –> het slaat natuurlijk op iedereen. Iedereen die denkt maakt weleens denkfouten. Hoe beter je er bewust van bent hoe beter je ze kan voorkomen. Ik word vaak zat gewezen op een denkfout. Dat je ze probeert niet/zo min mogelijk te maken betekent niet dat je er gevrijwaard van bent.

      Log in to Reply
  3. pro-hom says

    16 December 2011 at 02:41

    Maarten:
    Oh, gelukkig dat je er zo over denkt.
    Valt me weer mee van jou.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Steun ons via:
Een aankoopbol.com Partner (meer info)
Of een donatie

Schrijf je in voor de nieuwsbrief!

Skeptic RSS feed

  • Error
  • Error
  • SBM

RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: cURL error 28: Connection timed out after 10001 milliseconds

RSS Error: Retrieved unsupported status code "404"

How Journalists Enable the COVID Amnesia Project
14 May 2026 - Jonathan Howard

People need to know the past credibility of our medical leaders to accurately gauge their current credibility. The post How Journalists Enable the COVID Amnesia Project first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

NYT Epic Fail on Acupuncture
13 May 2026 - Steven Novella

This makes the third time in just two weeks that a major mainstream or scientific outlet published credible nonsense about acupuncture, but I had to cover it after dozens of people e-mailed me about this recent article in the New York Times Magazine. It is ostensibly about the interstitium, but pivots to using this recent discovery to retcon an alleged explanation for how […] The post NYT Epic Fail on Acupuncture first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

Can Medical Schools Really Teach 71 Nutrition ‘Competencies’?  Should They?
12 May 2026 - Henry MIller

In recent years, nutrition has become the focus of renewed attention in medical education. Advocates argue that physicians receive too little formal training about diet and that more comprehensive nutrition education is needed to address chronic diseases such as obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and certain cancers. A greater focus on the “root causes of chronic diseases” is a mantra of the Make […] The post Can Medical Schools Really Teach 71 Nutrition ‘Competencies’?  Should They? first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

Recente reacties

  • Hans1263
    on Artsencollectief geeft podium aan kankerkwakzalver William Makis op hun quackfest
    @Klaas van Dijk Vanzelfsprekend bent u niet verantwoordelijk. U hebt voldoende gewaarschuwd. Er moet kennelijk eerst iets voorvallen waarbij
  • Renate1
    on Artsencollectief geeft podium aan kankerkwakzalver William Makis op hun quackfest
    @ Hans, Daar heeft u gelijk in. We weten alleen dat mevrouw onzinnige ideeën over covid en de kiemtheorie verspreid
  • Klaas van Dijk
    on Artsencollectief geeft podium aan kankerkwakzalver William Makis op hun quackfest
    @Hans1263, ik heb luid en duidelijk tegen ZGT gezegd dat ik niet verantwoordelijk en ook niet aansprakelijk ben voor vermijdbare
  • Hans1263
    on Artsencollectief geeft podium aan kankerkwakzalver William Makis op hun quackfest
    @Renate1 Voor de duidelijkheid: ik bedoelde hierboven niet te zeggen dat mw. Walk de bekende (beruchte) "alternatieve geneeswijzen" propagee
  • Renate1
    on Artsencollectief geeft podium aan kankerkwakzalver William Makis op hun quackfest
    Geen idee. Bieden ziekenhuizen alternatieve geneeswijzen aan? Blijkens dit artikel staat het UMC er wel voor open https://www.kwakzalverij.n

Archief Kloptdatwel.nl

Copyright © 2026 · Metro Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in