• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Kloptdatwel?

  • Home
  • Onderwerpen
    • (Bij)Geloof
    • Columns
    • Complottheorieën
    • Factchecking
    • Gezondheid
    • Hoax
    • Humor
    • K-d-Weetjes
    • New Age
    • Paranormaal
    • Pseudowetenschap
    • Reclame Code Commissie
    • Skepticisme
    • Skeptics in the Pub
    • Skeptische TV
    • UFO
    • Wetenschap
    • Overig
  • Skeptisch Chatten
  • Werkstuk?
  • Contact
  • Over Kloptdatwel.nl
    • Activiteiten agenda
    • Colofon – (copyright info)
    • Gedragsregels van Kloptdatwel
    • Kloptdatwel in de media
    • Interessante Links
    • Over het Bol.com Partnerprogramma en andere affiliate programma’s.
    • Social media & Twitter
    • Nieuwsbrief
    • Privacybeleid
    • Skeptisch Chatten
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 1)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 2)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 3)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 4)
You are here: Home / Humor / Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt

8 December 2011 by Maarten Koller 4 Comments

Cracked.com is een humoristische website over lijstjes. Top 10 dit, de 7 beste zo etc. Wie is er niet dol op lijstjes?

Onlangs schreven ze over: 5 Logical Fallacies That Make You Wrong More Than You Think

Hieronder hun nummer 5:

#5. We’re Not Programmed to Seek “Truth,” We’re Programmed to “Win”

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 1

Think about the last time you ran into a coworker or family member spouting some easily disproven conspiracy theory — somebody who still thinks Obama’s birth certificate is a fake or that Dick Cheney arranged 9/11 to cover up his theft of $2.3 trillion from the government. When they were shown proof that their conspiracy theory was wrong, did they back down? Did they get this look of realization on their face and say, “Wow … if this is untrue, then maybe the other ‘facts’ upon which I’ve based my fringe beliefs also aren’t true. Thank you, kind stranger, for helping me rethink my entire political philosophy!”

That has literally never happened in the history of human conversation. Whether it’s a politician whose point has been refuted or a conspiracy theorist who has been definitively proven insane, they will immediately shift to the next talking point or conspiracy theory that backs up their side, not even skipping a beat. They keep fighting to defend their position even after it is factually shown to be untrue. But what’s really weird is that process — of sticking to your guns even after you’ve been proven definitively wrong — is apparently the entire reason humans invented arguing.

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 2Getty
“OK, so Dick Cheney doesn’t have a third arm. He might still be capable of spitting acid.”

The Science:

It’s called the argumentative theory of reasoning, and it says that humans didn’t learn to ask questions and offer answers in order to find universal truths. We did it as a way to gain authority over others. That’s right — they think that reason itself evolved to help us bully people into getting what we want. Here’s how a proponent puts it:

“‘Reasoning doesn’t have this function of helping us to get better beliefs and make better decisions,’ said Hugo Mercier, who is a co-author of the journal article, with Dan Sperber. ‘It was a purely social phenomenon. It evolved to help us convince others and to be careful when others try to convince us.’ Truth and accuracy were beside the point.”

And as evidence, the researchers point out that after thousands of years of humans sitting around campfires and arguing about issues, these glaring flaws in our logic still exist. Why hasn’t evolution weeded them out? The answer, they say, is that these cognitive flaws are adaptations to a system that’s working perfectly fine, thank you. Our evolutionary compulsion is to triumph, even if it means being totally, illogically, proudly wrong.

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 3Getty
“Check it out, you guys, Carl has something called ‘Loose Change’ loaded up on his iPhone.”

Yes, kids, being a dick works.

So During Your Next Argument, Remember …

You do this, too. If you’re a human being, you’re from a long line of people who got to the winner’s circle again and again by ignoring facts in favor of advancing your side. So, the next time you find yourself desperately Googling for some factual example that proves your argument is right, and failing to find even one, stop. See if you can put the brakes on and actually say, out loud, “Wait a second. If the things I’m saying in order to bolster my argument are consistently wrong, then maybe my argument is also wrong.”

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 4
“But if President Obama isn’t a serial killer, what does my life mean?”

It’s going to be harder than you think. Back when evolution was still sculpting your ancestor’s brains, admitting you were wrong to the person you were debating got you bred out of existence. These days, being able to admit you’re wrong is the greatest skill you can develop if you want to stay married.

Lees hier de andere 4: 5 Logical Fallacies That Make You Wrong More Than You Think | Cracked.com

Steun Kloptdatwel

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 5Waardeer je dit artikel? Je kunt onze site steunen met een financiële bijdrage. Dat waarderen wij dan weer! Een donatie kun je doen via dit betaalverzoek (of klik op de afbeelding hiernaast).

NB de rekening staat op naam van Maarten Koller, formeel eigenaar van deze site.

« Previous Entry
Leugens over Louwes
Next Entry »
Pas op: abstraheren is weglaten!

Filed Under: Humor Tagged With: cracked.com, drogreden

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Anony says

    8 December 2011 at 11:11

    Altijd leuk om te lezen, Cracked. Je moet er soms wel een korrel zout bij nemen, maar dit lijstje is een feest van herkenning.

    Log in to Reply
  2. pro-hom says

    9 December 2011 at 19:21

    Slaat het ook op jouzelf, Maarten?
    En op sceptici in het algemeen?Of zijn jullie de enigen die hiervan gevrijwaard zijn?

    Log in to Reply
    • Maarten Koller says

      9 December 2011 at 20:51

      Jazeker slaat die op mij –> het slaat natuurlijk op iedereen. Iedereen die denkt maakt weleens denkfouten. Hoe beter je er bewust van bent hoe beter je ze kan voorkomen. Ik word vaak zat gewezen op een denkfout. Dat je ze probeert niet/zo min mogelijk te maken betekent niet dat je er gevrijwaard van bent.

      Log in to Reply
  3. pro-hom says

    16 December 2011 at 02:41

    Maarten:
    Oh, gelukkig dat je er zo over denkt.
    Valt me weer mee van jou.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Steun ons via:
Een aankoopbol.com Partner (meer info)
Of een donatie

Schrijf je in voor de nieuwsbrief!

Skeptic RSS feed

  • Skepsis
  • Error
  • SBM
Kan de aarde eventjes zwaartekracht verliezen?
12 August 2026 - SkepsisSiteBeheerder

NASA zou hebben berekend dat op 12 augustus 2026 de aarde 7,3 seconden zonder zwaartekracht zou komen te zitten. Onzin natuurlijk, maar wat zou er gebeuren als het toch zou kunnen?Lees meer Kan de aarde eventjes zwaartekracht verliezen? › [...]

Ype & Ionica zijn skeptisch
3 August 2026 - Ward van Beek

. Ook in het zomernummer van Skepter zijn Ype en Ionica weer skeptisch … [...]

No Title
31 July 2026 - Ward van Beek

. Robert Baden-Powell liet er in 1908, in de eerste druk van zijn Scouting for boys geen twijfel over bestaan: ‘Ga nooit pal na een maaltijd in diep water zwemmen, want dan krijg je hoogstwaarschijnlijk kramp, waardoor je dubbelklapt en…Lees meer › [...]

RSS Error: Retrieved unsupported status code "404"

Trump’s Frontal Assault on Vaccines
12 August 2026 - Steven Novella
Trump’s Frontal Assault on Vaccines

Trump recently signed an executive order calling for a reduction in the childhood vaccine schedule from the current 17 vaccines to 11. It also calls for breaking up the MMR (mumps, measles, and rubella) vaccine into individual vaccines. The administration is calling these “Gold Standard Childhood Vaccine Recommendations.” Nothing could be further from the truth. This is a continuation of a trend […] The post Trump’s Frontal Assault on Vaccines first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

Cancer quackery: Under MAHA, everything old is new again
10 August 2026 - David Gorski
Cancer quackery: Under MAHA, everything old is new again

A viral Instagram post claims that cancer is not a disease, but rather a defense mechanism against "toxins." Everything old is new again under MAHA. The post Cancer quackery: Under MAHA, everything old is new again first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

Stanford President Jonathan Levin: You Should Host a Conference on the Job Performance of MAHA/MAGA Doctors
7 August 2026 - Jonathan Howard
Stanford President Jonathan Levin:  You Should Host a Conference on the Job Performance of MAHA/MAGA Doctors

In October 2024, you gave the introduction to a COVID Amnesia Project conference that featured disinformation superspreaders and advocates of herd immunity through mass infection. How do you feel these MAHA/MAGA doctors are doing today? The post Stanford President Jonathan Levin: You Should Host a Conference on the Job Performance of MAHA/MAGA Doctors first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

Recente reacties

  • Klaas van Dijk
    on Oversterftestudie van Saskia Mostert et al. eindelijk ingetrokken
    In het vrijgegeven geanonimiseerde document van het Prinses Máxima Centrum staat al in de eerste zin dat de bevindingen van
  • Pepijn van Erp
    on Oversterftestudie van Saskia Mostert et al. eindelijk ingetrokken
    Op X gaf Jona Walk net te kennen de retractie volkomen onterecht te vinden en politiek gemotiveerd. met Bramm Bakker
  • Klaas van Dijk
    on Bedenkingen bij het rapport over oversterfte van Ronald Meester en Marc Jacobs
    Het oversterfterapport van Ronald Meester & co. begint met een lovende verwijzing naar een gruwelijke antivax publicatie in het tijdschr
  • Klaas van Dijk
    on Oversterftestudie van Saskia Mostert et al. eindelijk ingetrokken
    Ik denk dat het goed is dat Saskia Mostert (of haar man/echtgenoot Marcel Hoogland) hier of elders aangeven waarom Saskia
  • That BMJ Public Health article on excess mortality by Saskia Mostert et al. has finally been retracted – Pepijn van Erp
    on Oversterftestudie van Saskia Mostert et al. eindelijk ingetrokken
    […] a year trying to elicit a comment from her. [Added: as Klaas van Dijk rightly points out in the

Archief Kloptdatwel.nl

Copyright © 2026 · Metro Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in