• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Kloptdatwel?

  • Home
  • Onderwerpen
    • (Bij)Geloof
    • Columns
    • Complottheorieën
    • Factchecking
    • Gezondheid
    • Hoax
    • Humor
    • K-d-Weetjes
    • New Age
    • Paranormaal
    • Pseudowetenschap
    • Reclame Code Commissie
    • Skepticisme
    • Skeptics in the Pub
    • Skeptische TV
    • UFO
    • Wetenschap
    • Overig
  • Skeptisch Chatten
  • Werkstuk?
  • Contact
  • Over Kloptdatwel.nl
    • Activiteiten agenda
    • Colofon – (copyright info)
    • Gedragsregels van Kloptdatwel
    • Kloptdatwel in de media
    • Interessante Links
    • Over het Bol.com Partnerprogramma en andere affiliate programma’s.
    • Social media & Twitter
    • Nieuwsbrief
    • Privacybeleid
    • Skeptisch Chatten
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 1)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 2)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 3)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 4)

cracked.com

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt

8 December 2011 by Maarten Koller 4 Comments

Cracked.com is een humoristische website over lijstjes. Top 10 dit, de 7 beste zo etc. Wie is er niet dol op lijstjes?

Onlangs schreven ze over: 5 Logical Fallacies That Make You Wrong More Than You Think

Hieronder hun nummer 5:

#5. We’re Not Programmed to Seek “Truth,” We’re Programmed to “Win”

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 1

Think about the last time you ran into a coworker or family member spouting some easily disproven conspiracy theory — somebody who still thinks Obama’s birth certificate is a fake or that Dick Cheney arranged 9/11 to cover up his theft of $2.3 trillion from the government. When they were shown proof that their conspiracy theory was wrong, did they back down? Did they get this look of realization on their face and say, “Wow … if this is untrue, then maybe the other ‘facts’ upon which I’ve based my fringe beliefs also aren’t true. Thank you, kind stranger, for helping me rethink my entire political philosophy!”

That has literally never happened in the history of human conversation. Whether it’s a politician whose point has been refuted or a conspiracy theorist who has been definitively proven insane, they will immediately shift to the next talking point or conspiracy theory that backs up their side, not even skipping a beat. They keep fighting to defend their position even after it is factually shown to be untrue. But what’s really weird is that process — of sticking to your guns even after you’ve been proven definitively wrong — is apparently the entire reason humans invented arguing.

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 2Getty
“OK, so Dick Cheney doesn’t have a third arm. He might still be capable of spitting acid.”

The Science:

It’s called the argumentative theory of reasoning, and it says that humans didn’t learn to ask questions and offer answers in order to find universal truths. We did it as a way to gain authority over others. That’s right — they think that reason itself evolved to help us bully people into getting what we want. Here’s how a proponent puts it:

“‘Reasoning doesn’t have this function of helping us to get better beliefs and make better decisions,’ said Hugo Mercier, who is a co-author of the journal article, with Dan Sperber. ‘It was a purely social phenomenon. It evolved to help us convince others and to be careful when others try to convince us.’ Truth and accuracy were beside the point.”

And as evidence, the researchers point out that after thousands of years of humans sitting around campfires and arguing about issues, these glaring flaws in our logic still exist. Why hasn’t evolution weeded them out? The answer, they say, is that these cognitive flaws are adaptations to a system that’s working perfectly fine, thank you. Our evolutionary compulsion is to triumph, even if it means being totally, illogically, proudly wrong.

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 3Getty
“Check it out, you guys, Carl has something called ‘Loose Change’ loaded up on his iPhone.”

Yes, kids, being a dick works.

So During Your Next Argument, Remember …

You do this, too. If you’re a human being, you’re from a long line of people who got to the winner’s circle again and again by ignoring facts in favor of advancing your side. So, the next time you find yourself desperately Googling for some factual example that proves your argument is right, and failing to find even one, stop. See if you can put the brakes on and actually say, out loud, “Wait a second. If the things I’m saying in order to bolster my argument are consistently wrong, then maybe my argument is also wrong.”

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 4
“But if President Obama isn’t a serial killer, what does my life mean?”

It’s going to be harder than you think. Back when evolution was still sculpting your ancestor’s brains, admitting you were wrong to the person you were debating got you bred out of existence. These days, being able to admit you’re wrong is the greatest skill you can develop if you want to stay married.

Lees hier de andere 4: 5 Logical Fallacies That Make You Wrong More Than You Think | Cracked.com

Filed Under: Humor Tagged With: cracked.com, drogreden

Primary Sidebar

Steun ons via:
Een aankoopbol.com Partner (meer info)
Of een donatie

Schrijf je in voor de nieuwsbrief!

Skeptic RSS feed

  • Skepsis
  • Error
  • SBM
Hamerhype
3 September 2026 - SkepsisSiteBeheerder

Tienerjongens die zichzelf met hamers slaan om een betere kaaklijn te ontwikkelen: media van Nieuwsuur tot de BBC sloegen onlangs alarm over de gevaren van ‘bonesmashing’. Maar hoe ver gaat deze hype echt?Lees meer Hamerhype › [...]

Kan de aarde eventjes zwaartekracht verliezen?
12 August 2026 - SkepsisSiteBeheerder

NASA zou hebben berekend dat op 12 augustus 2026 de aarde 7,3 seconden zonder zwaartekracht zou komen te zitten. Onzin natuurlijk, maar wat zou er gebeuren als het toch zou kunnen?Lees meer Kan de aarde eventjes zwaartekracht verliezen? › [...]

Ype & Ionica zijn skeptisch
3 August 2026 - Ward van Beek

. Ook in het zomernummer van Skepter zijn Ype en Ionica weer skeptisch … [...]

RSS Error: Retrieved unsupported status code "404"

Dr. Remington Nevin: Michigan’s own RFK Jr. or Dr. Joseph Ladapo?
7 September 2026 - David Gorski
Dr. Remington Nevin: Michigan’s own RFK Jr. or Dr. Joseph Ladapo?

Dr. Remington Nevin is a the director of a county health department in Michigan but is poised to become Michigan's very own Dr. Joseph Ladapo, a MAHA crank put in charge of a state's public health apparatus. The post Dr. Remington Nevin: Michigan’s own RFK Jr. or Dr. Joseph Ladapo? first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny Predicted That COVID Vaccines Would Kill Over 50 Million Americans. What Happened Next?
4 September 2026 - Jonathan Howard
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny Predicted That COVID Vaccines Would Kill Over 50 Million Americans.  What Happened Next?

The doctors I write about have all made preposterous pandemic predictions, over and over again, and never once looked back or even noticed the people they hurt in the process. The post Dr. Sherri Tenpenny Predicted That COVID Vaccines Would Kill Over 50 Million Americans. What Happened Next? first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

Why Did the “Urgency of Normal” Stop Caring About the Mental, Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Health of our Children?
3 September 2026 - Jonathan Howard
Why Did the “Urgency of Normal” Stop Caring About the Mental, Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Health of our Children?

Genuine concern is consistent concern, and the silence from the Urgency of Normal about literally everything happening today is clarifying. The post Why Did the “Urgency of Normal” Stop Caring About the Mental, Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Health of our Children? first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

Recente reacties

  • Renate1
    on Oversterftestudie van Saskia Mostert et al. eindelijk ingetrokken
    @ Hans, Ik denk eerder dat het een soort verkeerde interpretatie van Darwin is. Het idee dat de mensheid er
  • Hans1263
    on Oversterftestudie van Saskia Mostert et al. eindelijk ingetrokken
    @Renate Tja, velen geloven dat er een bedoeling achter "de natuur" zou zitten. Meer dan geloof is dat niet. Hopen
  • Renate1
    on Oversterftestudie van Saskia Mostert et al. eindelijk ingetrokken
    @ Hans, Deze mensen weten altijd wel een excuus te verzinnen en lijken te denken dat alles op de een
  • Hans1263
    on Oversterftestudie van Saskia Mostert et al. eindelijk ingetrokken
    Aha, zit het zo? Ik ben weer een stuk wijzer! 😅
  • Renate1
    on Oversterftestudie van Saskia Mostert et al. eindelijk ingetrokken
    Ja, maar de mazelen zijn een kinderziekte en de kinderen die daaraan overlijden waren natuurlijk al niet zo gezond. Vraag

Archief Kloptdatwel.nl

Copyright © 2026 · Metro Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in