• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Kloptdatwel?

  • Home
  • Onderwerpen
    • (Bij)Geloof
    • Columns
    • Complottheorieën
    • Factchecking
    • Gezondheid
    • Hoax
    • Humor
    • K-d-Weetjes
    • New Age
    • Paranormaal
    • Pseudowetenschap
    • Reclame Code Commissie
    • Skepticisme
    • Skeptics in the Pub
    • Skeptische TV
    • UFO
    • Wetenschap
    • Overig
  • Skeptisch Chatten
  • Werkstuk?
  • Contact
  • Over Kloptdatwel.nl
    • Activiteiten agenda
    • Colofon – (copyright info)
    • Gedragsregels van Kloptdatwel
    • Kloptdatwel in de media
    • Interessante Links
    • Over het Bol.com Partnerprogramma en andere affiliate programma’s.
    • Social media & Twitter
    • Nieuwsbrief
    • Privacybeleid
    • Skeptisch Chatten
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 1)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 2)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 3)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 4)

cracked.com

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt

8 December 2011 by Maarten Koller 4 Comments

Cracked.com is een humoristische website over lijstjes. Top 10 dit, de 7 beste zo etc. Wie is er niet dol op lijstjes?

Onlangs schreven ze over: 5 Logical Fallacies That Make You Wrong More Than You Think

Hieronder hun nummer 5:

#5. We’re Not Programmed to Seek “Truth,” We’re Programmed to “Win”

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 1

Think about the last time you ran into a coworker or family member spouting some easily disproven conspiracy theory — somebody who still thinks Obama’s birth certificate is a fake or that Dick Cheney arranged 9/11 to cover up his theft of $2.3 trillion from the government. When they were shown proof that their conspiracy theory was wrong, did they back down? Did they get this look of realization on their face and say, “Wow … if this is untrue, then maybe the other ‘facts’ upon which I’ve based my fringe beliefs also aren’t true. Thank you, kind stranger, for helping me rethink my entire political philosophy!”

That has literally never happened in the history of human conversation. Whether it’s a politician whose point has been refuted or a conspiracy theorist who has been definitively proven insane, they will immediately shift to the next talking point or conspiracy theory that backs up their side, not even skipping a beat. They keep fighting to defend their position even after it is factually shown to be untrue. But what’s really weird is that process — of sticking to your guns even after you’ve been proven definitively wrong — is apparently the entire reason humans invented arguing.

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 2Getty
“OK, so Dick Cheney doesn’t have a third arm. He might still be capable of spitting acid.”

The Science:

It’s called the argumentative theory of reasoning, and it says that humans didn’t learn to ask questions and offer answers in order to find universal truths. We did it as a way to gain authority over others. That’s right — they think that reason itself evolved to help us bully people into getting what we want. Here’s how a proponent puts it:

“‘Reasoning doesn’t have this function of helping us to get better beliefs and make better decisions,’ said Hugo Mercier, who is a co-author of the journal article, with Dan Sperber. ‘It was a purely social phenomenon. It evolved to help us convince others and to be careful when others try to convince us.’ Truth and accuracy were beside the point.”

And as evidence, the researchers point out that after thousands of years of humans sitting around campfires and arguing about issues, these glaring flaws in our logic still exist. Why hasn’t evolution weeded them out? The answer, they say, is that these cognitive flaws are adaptations to a system that’s working perfectly fine, thank you. Our evolutionary compulsion is to triumph, even if it means being totally, illogically, proudly wrong.

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 3Getty
“Check it out, you guys, Carl has something called ‘Loose Change’ loaded up on his iPhone.”

Yes, kids, being a dick works.

So During Your Next Argument, Remember …

You do this, too. If you’re a human being, you’re from a long line of people who got to the winner’s circle again and again by ignoring facts in favor of advancing your side. So, the next time you find yourself desperately Googling for some factual example that proves your argument is right, and failing to find even one, stop. See if you can put the brakes on and actually say, out loud, “Wait a second. If the things I’m saying in order to bolster my argument are consistently wrong, then maybe my argument is also wrong.”

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 4
“But if President Obama isn’t a serial killer, what does my life mean?”

It’s going to be harder than you think. Back when evolution was still sculpting your ancestor’s brains, admitting you were wrong to the person you were debating got you bred out of existence. These days, being able to admit you’re wrong is the greatest skill you can develop if you want to stay married.

Lees hier de andere 4: 5 Logical Fallacies That Make You Wrong More Than You Think | Cracked.com

Filed Under: Humor Tagged With: cracked.com, drogreden

Primary Sidebar

Steun ons via:
Een aankoopbol.com Partner (meer info)
Of een donatie

Schrijf je in voor de nieuwsbrief!

Skeptic RSS feed

  • Skepsis
  • Error
  • SBM
13 oktober: International Skeptics Day
18 September 2026 - Ward van Beek

.Elk jaar op 13 oktober is het International Skeptics Day. Verspreid over de wereld zijn er talloze organisaties die zich inzetten voor het bevorderen van kritisch denken. En op dinsdag 13 oktober 2026 kunnen zij elkaar weer online ontmoeten! Die…Lees meer 13 oktober: International Skeptics Day › [...]

Altijd al alert op valsspelen
17 September 2026 - Ward van Beek

. Als epidemioloog en wetenschappelijke integriteitsexpert hield Frits Rosendaal zich zijn hele loopbaan bezig met al dan niet ondeugdelijk onderzoek. Dit najaar gaat hij met emeritaat. Stan van Pelt sprak met hem (Skepter 39.3). ‘Mijn vader vroeg zich al af…Lees meer Altijd al alert op valsspelen › [...]

Onvervulde techbeloftes
16 September 2026 - Ward van Beek

.Vliegende auto’s, superbatterijen, hersenchips, kernfusie, kweekvlees: het zijn allemaal beloftes die de wereld zeggen te veranderen. Maar hype en werkelijkheid botsen op techniek, regels en geld, en voor de gewone consument blijft de toekomst voorlopig een beetje ongrijpbaar. Niels Olfert…Lees meer Onvervulde techbeloftes › [...]

RSS Error: Retrieved unsupported status code "404"

Hidden in Plain Cite: HHS backs Teen Pregnancy Program priorities with phantom references
22 September 2026 - David Weinberg
Hidden in Plain Cite: HHS backs Teen Pregnancy Program priorities with phantom references

This story came to my attention through mainstream headlines noting that a federal judge accused HHS of using fake and/or AI-generated references: So I decided to take a close look at the references myself. These dubious references appeared in two Notices of Funding Opportunity (NOFOs) issued by the Teen Pregnancy Prevention program (TPP), administered by the Office of Population Affairs (OPA). The […] The post Hidden in Plain Cite: HHS backs Teen Pregnancy Program priorities with phantom references first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

Vaccine-Advocates Didn’t Advocate for Moderna’s Failed CMV Vaccine. What Does That Reveal About the Vaccines We Do Advocate For?
22 September 2026 - Jonathan Howard
Vaccine-Advocates Didn’t Advocate for Moderna’s Failed CMV Vaccine. What Does That Reveal About the Vaccines We Do Advocate For?

A vaccine-advocates in a cult? The post Vaccine-Advocates Didn’t Advocate for Moderna’s Failed CMV Vaccine. What Does That Reveal About the Vaccines We Do Advocate For? first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

Once again, The BMJ, wittingly or unwittingly, reinforces an antivax narrative
21 September 2026 - David Gorski
Once again, The BMJ, wittingly or unwittingly, reinforces an antivax narrative

Last week The BMJ published an investigation alleging that the algorithm for spotting safety signals after COVID vaccination was flawed and that the FDA ignored it, amplifying an old antivax narrative. Again. WTF, BMJ? The post Once again, The BMJ, wittingly or unwittingly, reinforces an antivax narrative first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

Recente reacties

  • Hans1263
    on Laat trauma echt sporen achter in je lichaam, brein en geest?
    Naar mijn idee een hoog kwakzalfgehalte. Maar ja, ik heb dan ook buitengewoon slechte herinneringen aan de gore manipulaties van
  • Hans1263
    on De linke weekendbijlage (38-2026)
    Nogal wat schuinsmarcheerders en andere malloten in de familie; RFK jr. heeft het niet van vreemden.
  • Klaas van Dijk
    on Artsencollectief geeft podium aan kankerkwakzalver William Makis op hun quackfest
    Dit lijkt mij ook van toepassing voor iedere deelnemer aan het congres van het Artsen Covid Collectief https://edzardernst.com/2026/09/amid-
  • Renate1
    on De linke weekendbijlage (38-2026)
    Het punt is overigens dat een groot deel van z'n familie ook afstand van hem heeft genomen, dus het gedrag
  • Hans1263
    on De linke weekendbijlage (38-2026)
    RFK jr. is een ordinaire bedrieger met valse bedoelingen. Wat er nog over was aan een beetje waardering voor de

Archief Kloptdatwel.nl

Copyright © 2026 · Metro Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in