• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Kloptdatwel?

  • Home
  • Onderwerpen
    • (Bij)Geloof
    • Columns
    • Complottheorieën
    • Factchecking
    • Gezondheid
    • Hoax
    • Humor
    • K-d-Weetjes
    • New Age
    • Paranormaal
    • Pseudowetenschap
    • Reclame Code Commissie
    • Skepticisme
    • Skeptics in the Pub
    • Skeptische TV
    • UFO
    • Wetenschap
    • Overig
  • Skeptisch Chatten
  • Werkstuk?
  • Contact
  • Over Kloptdatwel.nl
    • Activiteiten agenda
    • Colofon – (copyright info)
    • Gedragsregels van Kloptdatwel
    • Kloptdatwel in de media
    • Interessante Links
    • Over het Bol.com Partnerprogramma en andere affiliate programma’s.
    • Social media & Twitter
    • Nieuwsbrief
    • Privacybeleid
    • Skeptisch Chatten
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 1)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 2)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 3)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 4)

cracked.com

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt

8 December 2011 by Maarten Koller 4 Comments

Cracked.com is een humoristische website over lijstjes. Top 10 dit, de 7 beste zo etc. Wie is er niet dol op lijstjes?

Onlangs schreven ze over: 5 Logical Fallacies That Make You Wrong More Than You Think

Hieronder hun nummer 5:

#5. We’re Not Programmed to Seek “Truth,” We’re Programmed to “Win”

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 1

Think about the last time you ran into a coworker or family member spouting some easily disproven conspiracy theory — somebody who still thinks Obama’s birth certificate is a fake or that Dick Cheney arranged 9/11 to cover up his theft of $2.3 trillion from the government. When they were shown proof that their conspiracy theory was wrong, did they back down? Did they get this look of realization on their face and say, “Wow … if this is untrue, then maybe the other ‘facts’ upon which I’ve based my fringe beliefs also aren’t true. Thank you, kind stranger, for helping me rethink my entire political philosophy!”

That has literally never happened in the history of human conversation. Whether it’s a politician whose point has been refuted or a conspiracy theorist who has been definitively proven insane, they will immediately shift to the next talking point or conspiracy theory that backs up their side, not even skipping a beat. They keep fighting to defend their position even after it is factually shown to be untrue. But what’s really weird is that process — of sticking to your guns even after you’ve been proven definitively wrong — is apparently the entire reason humans invented arguing.

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 2Getty
“OK, so Dick Cheney doesn’t have a third arm. He might still be capable of spitting acid.”

The Science:

It’s called the argumentative theory of reasoning, and it says that humans didn’t learn to ask questions and offer answers in order to find universal truths. We did it as a way to gain authority over others. That’s right — they think that reason itself evolved to help us bully people into getting what we want. Here’s how a proponent puts it:

“‘Reasoning doesn’t have this function of helping us to get better beliefs and make better decisions,’ said Hugo Mercier, who is a co-author of the journal article, with Dan Sperber. ‘It was a purely social phenomenon. It evolved to help us convince others and to be careful when others try to convince us.’ Truth and accuracy were beside the point.”

And as evidence, the researchers point out that after thousands of years of humans sitting around campfires and arguing about issues, these glaring flaws in our logic still exist. Why hasn’t evolution weeded them out? The answer, they say, is that these cognitive flaws are adaptations to a system that’s working perfectly fine, thank you. Our evolutionary compulsion is to triumph, even if it means being totally, illogically, proudly wrong.

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 3Getty
“Check it out, you guys, Carl has something called ‘Loose Change’ loaded up on his iPhone.”

Yes, kids, being a dick works.

So During Your Next Argument, Remember …

You do this, too. If you’re a human being, you’re from a long line of people who got to the winner’s circle again and again by ignoring facts in favor of advancing your side. So, the next time you find yourself desperately Googling for some factual example that proves your argument is right, and failing to find even one, stop. See if you can put the brakes on and actually say, out loud, “Wait a second. If the things I’m saying in order to bolster my argument are consistently wrong, then maybe my argument is also wrong.”

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 4
“But if President Obama isn’t a serial killer, what does my life mean?”

It’s going to be harder than you think. Back when evolution was still sculpting your ancestor’s brains, admitting you were wrong to the person you were debating got you bred out of existence. These days, being able to admit you’re wrong is the greatest skill you can develop if you want to stay married.

Lees hier de andere 4: 5 Logical Fallacies That Make You Wrong More Than You Think | Cracked.com

Filed Under: Humor Tagged With: cracked.com, drogreden

Primary Sidebar

Steun ons via:
Een aankoopbol.com Partner (meer info)
Of een donatie

Schrijf je in voor de nieuwsbrief!

Skeptic RSS feed

  • Error
  • Error
  • SBM

RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: cURL error 28: Failed to connect to skepsis.nl port 443 after 5205 ms: Connection timed out

RSS Error: A feed could not be found at `https://skepp.be/feed`; the status code is `404` and content-type is `text/html; charset=UTF-8`

“Gain of Function” Research Is Misunderstood – And That Is A Problem
4 December 2025 - Henry MIller

Misplaced concerns or opposition could lead to overregulation or even banning The post “Gain of Function” Research Is Misunderstood – And That Is A Problem first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

The War Over Ultraprocessed Foods
3 December 2025 - Steven Novella

Recently the city of San Francisco sued several food giants (Kraft Heinz, Mondelez and Coca-Cola) for deceptively marketing “ultraprocessed foods” and then externalizing the resulting health care costs onto the public. They cite a recent Lancet review which concludes: “The totality of the evidence supports the thesis that displacement of long-established dietary patterns by ultra-processed foods is a key driver of the […] The post The War Over Ultraprocessed Foods first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

Dr. Vinay Prasad: “The Incidence of Myocarditis Found for Young Men after SARS-CoV-2 Infection is Larger Than What We Found for Myocarditis Following COVID-19 Vaccination.”
2 December 2025 - Jonathan Howard

That plus 12 other thoughts about Dr. Vinay Prasad's recent memo. The post Dr. Vinay Prasad: “The Incidence of Myocarditis Found for Young Men after SARS-CoV-2 Infection is Larger Than What We Found for Myocarditis Following COVID-19 Vaccination.” first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

Recente reacties

  • Hans1263 on Bedenkingen bij het rapport over oversterfte van Ronald Meester en Marc JacobsIk was ook goed in scheikunde, ben nooit apart gezet, maar ik voel me nog steeds apart. 😀
  • Renate1 on Bedenkingen bij het rapport over oversterfte van Ronald Meester en Marc JacobsIk was vrij goed in scheikunde op school. Daarom werd ik altijd apart gezet tijdens proefwerken.
  • Klaas van Dijk on Artsencollectief geeft podium aan kankerkwakzalver William Makis op hun quackfestDe Radboud UMC arts Jona Walk doet in haar toespraak en in de aan deze toespraak gekoppelde postings op Substack,
  • Hans1263 on Bedenkingen bij het rapport over oversterfte van Ronald Meester en Marc Jacobs@Renate Zo is het. Ja, dat komt precies, want anders kun je geen analytische chemie bedrijven en krijg je verkeerde
  • Renate1 on Bedenkingen bij het rapport over oversterfte van Ronald Meester en Marc Jacobs@ Hans, Dat bedoelde ik. Het is natuurlijk de optelsom van het atoomgewicht van de atomen in het molecuul.

Archief Kloptdatwel.nl

Copyright © 2025 · Metro Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in