• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Kloptdatwel?

  • Home
  • Onderwerpen
    • (Bij)Geloof
    • Columns
    • Complottheorieën
    • Factchecking
    • Gezondheid
    • Hoax
    • Humor
    • K-d-Weetjes
    • New Age
    • Paranormaal
    • Pseudowetenschap
    • Reclame Code Commissie
    • Skepticisme
    • Skeptics in the Pub
    • Skeptische TV
    • UFO
    • Wetenschap
    • Overig
  • Skeptisch Chatten
  • Werkstuk?
  • Contact
  • Over Kloptdatwel.nl
    • Activiteiten agenda
    • Colofon – (copyright info)
    • Gedragsregels van Kloptdatwel
    • Kloptdatwel in de media
    • Interessante Links
    • Over het Bol.com Partnerprogramma en andere affiliate programma’s.
    • Social media & Twitter
    • Nieuwsbrief
    • Privacybeleid
    • Skeptisch Chatten
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 1)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 2)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 3)
      • Skeptisch Chatten (archief 4)

cracked.com

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt

8 December 2011 by Maarten Koller 4 Comments

Cracked.com is een humoristische website over lijstjes. Top 10 dit, de 7 beste zo etc. Wie is er niet dol op lijstjes?

Onlangs schreven ze over: 5 Logical Fallacies That Make You Wrong More Than You Think

Hieronder hun nummer 5:

#5. We’re Not Programmed to Seek “Truth,” We’re Programmed to “Win”

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 1

Think about the last time you ran into a coworker or family member spouting some easily disproven conspiracy theory — somebody who still thinks Obama’s birth certificate is a fake or that Dick Cheney arranged 9/11 to cover up his theft of $2.3 trillion from the government. When they were shown proof that their conspiracy theory was wrong, did they back down? Did they get this look of realization on their face and say, “Wow … if this is untrue, then maybe the other ‘facts’ upon which I’ve based my fringe beliefs also aren’t true. Thank you, kind stranger, for helping me rethink my entire political philosophy!”

That has literally never happened in the history of human conversation. Whether it’s a politician whose point has been refuted or a conspiracy theorist who has been definitively proven insane, they will immediately shift to the next talking point or conspiracy theory that backs up their side, not even skipping a beat. They keep fighting to defend their position even after it is factually shown to be untrue. But what’s really weird is that process — of sticking to your guns even after you’ve been proven definitively wrong — is apparently the entire reason humans invented arguing.

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 2Getty
“OK, so Dick Cheney doesn’t have a third arm. He might still be capable of spitting acid.”

The Science:

It’s called the argumentative theory of reasoning, and it says that humans didn’t learn to ask questions and offer answers in order to find universal truths. We did it as a way to gain authority over others. That’s right — they think that reason itself evolved to help us bully people into getting what we want. Here’s how a proponent puts it:

“‘Reasoning doesn’t have this function of helping us to get better beliefs and make better decisions,’ said Hugo Mercier, who is a co-author of the journal article, with Dan Sperber. ‘It was a purely social phenomenon. It evolved to help us convince others and to be careful when others try to convince us.’ Truth and accuracy were beside the point.”

And as evidence, the researchers point out that after thousands of years of humans sitting around campfires and arguing about issues, these glaring flaws in our logic still exist. Why hasn’t evolution weeded them out? The answer, they say, is that these cognitive flaws are adaptations to a system that’s working perfectly fine, thank you. Our evolutionary compulsion is to triumph, even if it means being totally, illogically, proudly wrong.

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 3Getty
“Check it out, you guys, Carl has something called ‘Loose Change’ loaded up on his iPhone.”

Yes, kids, being a dick works.

So During Your Next Argument, Remember …

You do this, too. If you’re a human being, you’re from a long line of people who got to the winner’s circle again and again by ignoring facts in favor of advancing your side. So, the next time you find yourself desperately Googling for some factual example that proves your argument is right, and failing to find even one, stop. See if you can put the brakes on and actually say, out loud, “Wait a second. If the things I’m saying in order to bolster my argument are consistently wrong, then maybe my argument is also wrong.”

Cracked.com over 5 drogredenen waardoor je vaker fout zit dan je denkt 4
“But if President Obama isn’t a serial killer, what does my life mean?”

It’s going to be harder than you think. Back when evolution was still sculpting your ancestor’s brains, admitting you were wrong to the person you were debating got you bred out of existence. These days, being able to admit you’re wrong is the greatest skill you can develop if you want to stay married.

Lees hier de andere 4: 5 Logical Fallacies That Make You Wrong More Than You Think | Cracked.com

Filed Under: Humor Tagged With: cracked.com, drogreden

Primary Sidebar

Steun ons via:
Een aankoopbol.com Partner (meer info)
Of een donatie

Schrijf je in voor de nieuwsbrief!

Skeptic RSS feed

  • Skepsis
  • Error
  • SBM
De succesformule voor bedrog
16 March 2026 - Ward van Beek

De Keshe Foundation verkoopt pseudowetenschappelijke plasmatechnologie door met technische termen en autoriteit te strooien, bizarre voorspellingen te doen en zich af te zetten tegen de gevestigde wetenschap.Lees meer De succesformule voor bedrog › [...]

Sjamadriaan op de planken
12 March 2026 - Ward van Beek

Bekend als de kritische Sjamadriaan, blikt Adriaan ter Braack terug op zijn twee uitverkochte theatershows in Amsterdam en Utrecht. Lees meer Sjamadriaan op de planken › [...]

Een niet bepaald ‘inconvenient’ onderzoek
12 March 2026 - Ward van Beek

Júist verspreiders van desinformatie onderbouwen dat graag met onderzoek en wetenschappelijke argumenten. Onze nieuwe columnist Adriaan ter Braack (Sjamadriaan) neemt ze voor Skepter onder de loep. An Inconvenient Study is een onlangs verschenen documentaire, die ook te zien is op bijvoorbeeld het…Lees meer Een niet bepaald ‘inconvenient’ onderzoek › [...]

RSS Error: Retrieved unsupported status code "404"

Zoonotic Spillover Is A Problem
25 March 2026 - Steven Novella

Recently I gave the latest update on the origins of SARS-CoV-2 – bottom line, it was very likely a zoonotic spillover event and not a lab leak. Following that, I interviewed a researcher, Dr. Andersen, who is an expert on the origins of epidemics/pandemics and has researched this very question. He reinforced the spillover hypothesis, indicated he had considered the lab leak […] The post Zoonotic Spillover Is A Problem first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

RFK Jr. is definitely coming for your vaccines (part 9): ProPublica reports, and a bump in the road to remaking ACIP
23 March 2026 - David Gorski

A judge recently ruled that HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. went too far in his drive to turn ACIP into a an antivax committee. Meanwhile, ProPublica reports on where we are heading; it's not good. The post RFK Jr. is definitely coming for your vaccines (part 9): ProPublica reports, and a bump in the road to remaking ACIP first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

Vaccines Work. Here’s Why We Care About Your Unvaccinated Child.
20 March 2026 - Jonathan Howard

While normal people don't want any child to suffer or die because their parents were tricked by disinformation, the leaders of the anti-vaccine movement, who profit by lying about vaccines, don't care at all. The post Vaccines Work. Here’s Why We Care About Your Unvaccinated Child. first appeared on Science-Based Medicine. [...]

Recente reacties

  • Hans1263
    on Bedenkingen bij het rapport over oversterfte van Ronald Meester en Marc Jacobs
    @Klaas van Dijk Deze gore tactiek hoort bij de hierboven al genoemde zogenaamd "wetenschappelijke" instelling. Als er maar voldoende sensibe
  • Klaas van Dijk
    on Bedenkingen bij het rapport over oversterfte van Ronald Meester en Marc Jacobs
    @Hans1263, de bijdrage van Bram Bakker aan het recente congres van het Artsen Covid Collectief, zie elders hier op Kloptdatwel,
  • Hans1263
    on Bedenkingen bij het rapport over oversterfte van Ronald Meester en Marc Jacobs
    @Klaas van Dijk Opzettelijk verwarring scheppen m.b.v. een veel voorkomende naam? Een overplaatsing?
  • Klaas van Dijk
    on Bedenkingen bij het rapport over oversterfte van Ronald Meester en Marc Jacobs
    Sinds afgelopen oktober waren alle sporen over Bram Bakker, samensteller van Hoofdstuk 6 van het rapport over oversterfte en lid
  • Renate1
    on Leestip – Drie ex-sekteleden aan het woord. ‘Wie het systeem doorziet, wordt het probleem’.
    Ik weet niet welke uitdrukking de schrijfster nu precies gebruikte. Ze ging als kind wel graag naar de kerk, vooral

Archief Kloptdatwel.nl

Copyright © 2026 · Metro Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in